Re: Parentage out of Henry Denton away from Maryland

Re: Wingfield Coats-of-Arms

Brand new Tickencote visualize appears to date regarding at least 1650 according so you can webpage 3of Particular Records of one’s Wingfield Household members by Wingfield, John M.London: Murray, 1925 republished from the Wingfield Loved ones Society inside the 1991. ISBN0-937543-03-nine.

“Sir Robert Wyngfeld regarding Letheringham, his [Sir Robert who d. ily away from half a dozen or 7 sons and fivedaughters, and is also off your, with his people and you can grandchildren,who played no small part regarding the facts of domain away from The united kingdomt, one thepresent performs [Wingfield’s guide] snacks.

Their oldest young man is Sir John Wyngfeld out of Letheringham, Knight, who, that have hiswife, function the 2 main figures on the dated pedigree oils paintings whichprovide the subject of these details.

There are two of these oictures in existence, nearly identically exactly the same, oneat Tickencote Hall, Rutland, additionally the other at the Boughton Domestic, Northants. Itis as yet not known the modern and you may the backup.

Which pair are surrounded about ideal and you can bottom reports because of the each of their sixteen pupils, inside each circumstances Wingfield house (1) Bosville and you will (2) quarterly, Goushell plus the chequy layer

One in the Tickncote, now belonging to Lieut.-Col. John MauriceWingfield, try coated to your fabric, possesses most likely already been through it while the about1650, since it is probably so it is the house or property of one’s last SirRobert Wingfield away from Upton, when you look at the Northamptonshire, who’s considered features diedduring the brand new commonwealth, and several regarding whoever oils images had been on thattime removed in order to their cousin’s household from the Tickencote, when Upton try marketed, andwhich will still be truth be told there.”

The author states one “the picture when you look at the Boughton domestic can easily be tracedback so you’re able to 1677” (page 4) and offer a few comments from the mid 1700srefering so you’re able to way of one’s picture as well as demonstration on Duke ofMontague.

The author claims on web page six you to definitely “Whenever, otherwise of the whoever buy, or because of the just who they waspainted, remains a question undecided from the pros.”

Once again, my personal inquiries into the group cardiovascular system maybe not inside the genealogicalconnections out-of the players, (the latest Wingfields were researched fairlywell, and you will even after my personal typo towards Howard loved ones, I do have the pedigreeaccurately annotated within RI) but to the logic at which safeguards weredisplayed of the second a couple years. I think I have a concept of exactly what”should” get on the latest respective safeguards, and you may in the morning thinking as to why, in this situation,that will not seem to be what exactly is found. Often I’m misleading within the myunderstanding, or perhaps the Wingfield’s have been playing rather punctual and you may sagging withtheir hands for some goal which we would not yet see.

Kelly, thanks for sending myself photo, and you may through Tim to have protecting me personally the situation away from getting them online. Lookin which more as well as the pedigrees inside Viscount Powerscourt’s _Muniments of your Ancient Saxon Group of Wingfield_, the organization has grown to become obvious in my opinion; additionally, it seems that there is certainly you to definitely glaring heraldic error, in the middle Hur raderar jag mitt konto pГҐ CharmRomance?, possibly the source of your own frustration. I can accept I haven’t twice-looked every kids’ impalings and i get one almost every other unanswered concern (what’s the coroneted lozenge on all the way down sign in?). The new purple traces frequently layered on this photo regarding the publication are not for example helpful, additionally the annotated ‘key’ does not actually reproduce what captions and you may cannot identify everyone whose hands are shown.

There are two main interesting points to the picture suggesting one or two different concentrates. First, it is targeted on a 15th-century matrimony and you will reveals the children of these relationships, but zero after situation. 2nd, they suggests a collateral branch having lineage down to the latest seventeenth century.

The latest central committee is the wedding of Sir John Wingfield (d. 1481) so you can Age, dau. of Sir John Fitz Lewis and you may Anne (Montacute). The two rates kneel at the center, and are surmounted from the impalings of the parents’ possession in the wreaths. Brand new heraldic mistake will be here, because the Sir John’s father’s end both household and you can impales Gousell (in fact, Gousell quartered using this type of chequy layer). This is exactly a blunder. It is noticeable that quartering from Gousell and the chequy coating comes in at that point, this can not be one another quartered and you can impaled regarding the wreath (unless of course, by the implication, Sir John who d. 1481 got pulled a keen Oedipus and you may married his very own mom). One thing I do not recognize is the coroneted lozenge hanging above the youngsters in the straight down register.